Faridkot maharaja’s daughter approaches CJM’s courtroom, seeks motion towards 23 individuals
Faridkot, September 19
Two weeks after the Supreme Court docket upheld the Punjab and Haryana Excessive Court docket’s order awarding 50 per cent share of Faridkot’s erstwhile maharaja to his two daughters, one in every of them at the moment approached the courtroom of the Chief Judicial Justice of the Peace (CJM), looking for authorized proceedings towards 23 individuals, who, she alleged, had solid the maharaja’s will to divest her of the rights within the property.
Clinching proof of forgery
Practically 100 pages of the judgment give particulars of the forgery. When there may be clinching proof within the courtroom orders, the police assertion of cancelling the FIR towards the 23 individuals, who had solid the need, defies logic. Karamjit Dhaliwal, Amrit Kaur’s Counsel
The Maharawal Khewaji Belief had been taking care of all properties price Rs 25,000 crore for over 33 years. It was dissolved after the Supreme Court docket had, on September 7, declared the controversial will solid.
One of many maharaja’s daughters, Amrit Kaur, by means of her counsel Karamjit Dhaliwal, at the moment furnished a licensed copy of the SC order within the CJM’s courtroom and sought instructions for prison proceedings towards the 23 individuals.
In June 2020, the Faridkot police had registered a case towards the 23 individuals, together with a grandson of the maharaja and attorneys, below Sections 465, 467, 468 471, 420 and 120-B of the IPC for allegedly forging the need.
Later, in a dramatic flip of occasions, the police had approached the CJM’s courtroom right here and sought the cancellation of the FIR. On the premise of their investigation, the police had claimed there was no prima facie offence towards the accused, so the FIR should be cancelled.
Opposing the police’s cancellation report, Amrit Kaur had claimed that every one courts — from the CJM’s courtroom in Chandigarh to the SC — had discovered the need “solid”.
“Practically 100 pages of the judgment give particulars of the forgery. When there may be clinching proof within the courtroom orders, the police assertion of cancelling the FIR towards the 23 individuals, who had solid the need, defies logic,” claimed Amrit Kaur’s counsel.