Distilling illicit liquor a menace, has precipitated deaths in state: Punjab and Haryana Excessive Courtroom

Distilling illicit liquor a menace, has precipitated deaths in state: Punjab and Haryana Excessive Courtroom



Tribune Information Service

Saurabh Malik

Chandigarh, September 20

The Punjab and Haryana Excessive Courtroom has made it clear that the menace of distilling of illicit liquor is a major problem in Punjab, particularly in view of the deaths as a result of its consumption through the previous three-four years. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri additionally made it clear that confiscation of a “large amount” of lahan, the uncooked materials for distillation of illicit liquor, was definitely a related floor for denial of anticipatory bail to an accused.

No anticipatory bail

Confiscation of big amount of uncooked materials is definitely a related floor for denial of anticipatory bail. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

The assertion by Justice Puri got here on a petition by an accused for grant of anticipatory bail in an FIR registered on December 23, 2021, beneath the provisions of the Punjab Excise Act at a police station in Ropar district.

Opposing the plea, the state counsel contended that the menace was required to be checked since Punjab had witnessed plenty of deaths prior to now three-four years. Justice Puri’s Bench was additionally instructed that a big portion of the confiscated liquor was in plastic tarpaulin, which was in any other case additionally unhygienic and will make the lahan poisonous.

After listening to rival contentions and going by the paperwork, Justice Puri asserted that the allegations had been that the petitioner, together with co-accused, was distilling illicit liquor and 10, 000 litres of lahan was seized from a spot on the Punjab and Himachal Pradesh border.

The argument by the state counsel that the menace of distilling of illicit liquor was a major problem carried weight, particularly in view of the deaths. The mere indisputable fact that the petitioner was not discovered on the spot, or the land the place the exercise was allegedly being carried out, didn’t belong to him wouldn’t vest a proper in him for the grant of anticipatory bail. This was notably so when different related components, deserving consideration, had been in existence.

Justice Puri noticed that the petitioner was said to be concerned in 14 extra circumstances in Himachal Pradesh. The argument by his counsel that pendency of different circumstances couldn’t be handled as a bar for grant of bail gave the impression to be enticing, however didn’t lower ice as he was nonetheless dealing with trial in 11 circumstances.

“The petitioner is concerned in these circumstances, which have an effect on a big part of society. It has not solely an antagonistic social impression, but additionally impacts the rights of lives of the folks at massive. There is no such thing as a dispute concerning the truth that numerous folks had died as a result of consumption of spurious liquor within the state. Subsequently, confiscation of big amount of lahan, which impacts numerous individuals, can definitely change into a related floor for denial of anticipatory bail to the petitioner,” Justice Puri added.





Supply hyperlink

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.

%d bloggers like this: