Rapped by HC, Punjab recommends motion in opposition to DSP

Rapped by HC, Punjab recommends motion in opposition to DSP



Tribune Information Service

Chandigarh, November 16

Lower than six months after the Punjab and Haryana Excessive Courtroom known as for an motion taken report in opposition to a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) for furnishing factually incorrect data by the use of an affidavit in a rape case, departmental motion has been really useful in opposition to him.

Because the case got here up for resumed listening to earlier than Justice Vivek Puri’s Bench, an affidavit by Muktsar Senior Superintendent of Police Dhruman H Nimbale on the state’s behalf submitted {that a} show-cause discover was issued to DSP Amarjit Singh.

However the reply was discovered to be unsatisfactory and was submitted to Faridkot Vary Inspector-Basic of Police with a advice to provoke departmental inquiry in opposition to the officer. “Because the departmental motion has been really useful in opposition to DSP Amarjit Singh, no additional motion is named for on this courtroom at this stage,” Justice Puri asserted.

Justice Puri was listening to an everyday bail plea within the rape case registered at Sadar police station in Muktsar on June 15, 2021, below Sections 376, 511, 354-B and 506 of the IPC and the POCSO Act.

Justice Puri, on a earlier date of listening to, had known as for an motion taken report in opposition to the DSP, following which the show-cause discover was issued. Showing earlier than on the state’s behalf, an Further Advocate Basic had submitted: “After contemplating the lackadaisical and negligent angle of Amarjit Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, a show-cause discover has been issued to him”.

An earlier affidavit by the DSP had indicated that the testimony of the sufferer and different materials witnesses was but to be recorded — a submission opposed by the petitioner’s counsel. Justice Puri’s Bench was subsequently informed that the assertion of the complainant and sufferer had certainly been recorded.

Justice Puri had then asserted that the sooner affidavit positioned on report depicted “factually incorrect place” so far as the recording of the assertion of the sufferer and complainant within the trial courtroom was involved.

Justice Puri had added it was then noticed that an try was being made to shift the onus on to Assistant Sub Inspector Balwant Singh and to let DSP Amarjit Singh go scot-free. It was sought to be projected that the ASI had submitted unsuitable data to Amarjit Singh and informed him that the statements of the sufferer and complainant have been but to be recorded. However the side was factually incorrect.

Justice Puri had additionally taken on report the state counsel’s submission that contemplations have been now on to drop the inquiry in opposition to ASI Balwant Singh. Referring to a different affidavit by Nimbale, Justice Puri had added it indicated that Amarjit Singh, being the supervisory officer, was obligation certain to confirm the information and case standing from the police file.





Supply hyperlink

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.

%d bloggers like this: