SYL dispute: Execute Supreme Courtroom’s order, says Haryana

SYL dispute: Execute Supreme Courtroom’s order, says Haryana

Tribune Information Service

Satya Prakash

New Delhi, January 19

Sustaining {that a} negotiated settlement of the Sutlej-Yamuna Hyperlink (SYL) canal dispute can’t be reached, the Haryana Authorities on Thursday requested the Supreme Courtroom to ask the Punjab Authorities to implement its order to finish the development of the canal.

“After this court docket’s suggestion in September final yr, there have been a number of conferences. The final assembly happened in January this yr. Sadly, there has not been any progress… No resolution is in sight,” senior counsel Shyam Divan instructed a Bench led by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul.

“The matter has been repeatedly adjourned since 2017 to allow us to speak. However we consider the time has come for this court docket to contemplate issuing additional orders for the execution of the decree,” Divan stated, demanding the implementation of the highest court docket’s orders.

The Bench deferred the listening to to March 15 as Legal professional Common R Venkataramani was not out there.

The Supreme Courtroom had on September 9 final yr requested the chief ministers of Punjab and Haryana to satisfy and negotiate an amicable settlement to the vexed concern that has defied any resolution for many years regardless of a number of rounds of litigation.

It had requested the Union Jal Shakti Ministry to name a gathering of the 2 chief ministers for the aim.

“Water is a pure useful resource and residing beings should study to share it — whether or not people or states. The matter can’t be checked out from the perspective of just one metropolis or one state. It’s pure wealth to be shared and the way it’s to be shared is a mechanism to be labored out,” the Bench had stated.

The chief ministers of the 2 states met on January 4 throughout a gathering chaired by Union Water Assets Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat within the nationwide capital, however they failed to interrupt the ice.

Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann stated his state didn’t have even a single drop of water to share whilst Haryana CM Manohar Lal Khattar demanded the complete development of the canal. Khattar asserted that getting water by means of the SYL canal was Haryana’s proper.

On the root of the issue is the 1981 water-sharing settlement after Haryana was carved out of Punjab in 1966. For the efficient allocation of water, the Sutlej-Yamuna Hyperlink canal was to be constructed and the 2 states had been required to assemble their parts inside their territories. Whereas Haryana constructed its portion of the canal, after the preliminary section, Punjab stopped the work, resulting in a number of circumstances.

In 2002, the Supreme Courtroom decreed Haryana’s go well with and ordered Punjab to honour its commitments on water-sharing.

Supply hyperlink

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.

%d bloggers like this: